Means testing versus basic income: the (lack of) political support for a universal allowance
Helmuth Cremer, and Kerstin Roeder
IDEI Working Paper
n. 853, July 2015
Helmuth Cremer, and Kerstin Roeder, “Means testing versus basic income: the (lack of) political support for a universal allowance”, IDEI Working Paper, n. 853, July 2015.
This paper studies the political economy of a basic income (BI) versus a means tested welfare scheme. We show in a very simple setting that if society votes on the type of system, its generosity as well as the “severity” of means testing (if any), a BI system could only emerge in the political equilibrium under very strong and empirically implausible conditions. Instead, the political process leads to a means tested system. The necessity to draw political support does affect the design of the system, but it only implies that means testing becomes less severe so that benefits are extended also to themiddle classes. However, a fully universal system is rejected by a majority.
Basic income; Means testing; Political support;
- D3: Distribution
- D7: Analysis of Collective Decision-Making
- H2: Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
- H5: National Government Expenditures and Related Policies
Longevity Risk, Long Term Care (Social) Insurance
Helmuth Cremer, and Kerstin Roeder, “Means testing versus basic income: the (lack of) political support for a universal allowance”, Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 136, 2016, pp. 81–84.